Case · 1:25-cv-25402 · Public-record summary
1:25-cv-25402 — Ivankovich v. Schiller Ducanto & Fleck LLP
Public-record summary of the federal diversity action Ivankovich v. Schiller Ducanto & Fleck LLP, S.D. Fla. 1:25-cv-25402-KMW. Sources: CourtListener; PACER docket. Not a charging document.
Sources: CourtListener; PACER docket · partial index as of Oct 19, 2026 · not a charging document
Latest ruling: DE 97
Partial index, not a merits finding. DE 97 (entered 10/8/26), S.D. Fla. 1:25-cv-25402: order on the defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint (DE 33), granted in part and denied in part, Judge Kathleen M. Williams. Pages 1–2 were read. As of Oct 20, 2026 the full order remains unavailable on CourtListener/RECAP (PACER-gated); the docket has since advanced to DE 100 (filed 10/19/26). Which claims survive is not yet indexed.
court order · partial index · Verified · not a charge
Case metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|
| Case number | 1:25-cv-25402-KMW |
| Court | U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida |
| Judge | District Judge Kathleen M. Williams |
| Filed | November 19, 2025 |
| Cause | 28:1332 Diversity — Petition for Removal |
| Nature of suit | 360 P.I.: Other |
| Plaintiff | Steven Ivankovich |
| Defendant | Schiller Ducanto & Fleck LLP, et al. |
| Defendant | Joseph Seinitz |
| Counsel firms on docket | Meland Budwick, P.A.; Fowler White Burnett, P.A. |
| Pacer case ID | 701589 |
| CourtListener docket ID | 71934386 |
| CourtListener URL | /docket/71934386/ |
Underlying dispute (recited in DE 97, pages 1–2)
- Related state-court proceeding (not described here).
recited allegations, accepted as true for a motion-to-dismiss review only (Brooks v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Fla., 116 F.3d 1364, 1369 (11th Cir. 1997)) — not a merits finding · Alleged · not a charge
Key docket entries
Source: CourtListener.
DE 1 — Notice of Removal
Filed 11/19/25 · Schiller Ducanto & Fleck LLP
Notice of Removal filed by Schiller Ducanto & Fleck LLP, with Ivankovich's state-court complaint attached as Exhibit A.
party filing · Alleged · not a charge
DE 33 — Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Schiller Firm)
Fully briefed — Response DE 35, Reply DE 39 (per DE 97 recital)
Defendant's dispositive motion against the amended complaint.
DE 97 — ORDER on Motion to Dismiss
Entered 10/8/26 · Judge Kathleen M. Williams
The docket describes the motion as granted in part and denied in part. The court construed the amended complaint's allegations as true for review. Which claims survive is not yet indexed.
court order · ruling split · Verified · not a charge
DE 98 — Miscellaneous Relief
Entered 10/14/26
Docketed miscellaneous-relief filing; text not yet mirrored.
docket entry · Verified · not a charge
DE 99 — Transcript
Entered 10/14/26
Transcript filed on the docket; text not yet mirrored.
docket entry · Verified · not a charge
DE 100 — Motion for Extension of Time
Entered 10/19/26 · CourtListener entry 482049047
Post-DE 97 extension-of-time filing entered on the docket, confirming ongoing post-MTD proceedings.
docket entry · Verified · not a charge
Limitations
- The DE 97 order is only partially indexed (pages 1–2). As of Oct 19, 2026 the full order remains unavailable on CourtListener/RECAP (PACER-gated); the docket has since advanced to DE 99. Which claims survive is not yet indexed.
- Factual background in a Rule 12(b)(6) order is recited under the accept-as-true standard — it is not a merits finding.
- Complaint allegations are party contentions, not findings of fact.
- Nothing here is a court finding.